Did the Suburbs Kill the City Real Estate Market? Maybe Not.

One of the most striking effects of the pandemic in New York was the outbound movement from Manhattan to less crowded suburban neighborhoods and the subsequent boom of the suburban real estate market. Real estate in the city and suburbs seemed to be a zero sum game.

“This outbound pattern created the idea that the suburbs had their day at the cities’ expense, and that cities were over,” said Jonathan Miller, of Miller Samuel, the appraisal company. “As it turns out, the assumption that there’s a binary relationship between city and suburbs isn’t quite right, as measured by sales activity.”

Mr. Miller contributed data for this week’s chart, which provides a timeline of sales activity in Manhattan and the suburban county of Westchester, where activity is representative of that in other New York City suburbs.

By the end of the second quarter of 2020 — a couple of months into the pandemic market — sales in Manhattan had plummeted about 54 percent year over year. In Westchester, the drop in sales was about 27 percent. By Q3, six months into the pandemic, Manhattan sales had crept upward, about 46 percent lower compared with a year earlier, while Westchester’s were well on the rise, within 1 percent of the previous year’s levels. By Q4, the Westchester sales had surpassed the previous year by about 13 percent, while Manhattan sales were 21 percent lower.

Sales in Manhattan were still lagging, but there was steady improvement, and by Q1 of 2021, transactions in the borough had inched about 2 percent above the previous year’s level. Tracking the quarterly changes this way shows that Manhattan sales activity was increasing right along with that of the suburbs. So why does the dire impression of the Manhattan residential real estate market persist?

Source link Real Estate

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.